<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Branding and the new energy equation &#187; Nuclear</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.energybranding.com/category/verticals/nuclear/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.energybranding.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Feb 2011 16:49:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>The role of nuclear and renewable energy</title>
		<link>http://www.energybranding.com/2010/01/seize-nuclear-or-miss-targets-investment-iaea/</link>
		<comments>http://www.energybranding.com/2010/01/seize-nuclear-or-miss-targets-investment-iaea/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 17:02:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alan Brew</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Nuclear]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brand Strategy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[branding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy brandings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[future]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nuclear energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.energybranding.com/?p=34</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Political, social and environmental consequences of climate change have become global concerns. Renewable energy sources, such as wind and solar, would seem to have certain future as part of our national energy future. The alternative energy industry is <a class="continue-reading" href="http://www.energybranding.com/?p=34" rel="nofollow">continue reading</a>


Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://www.energybranding.com/2009/11/the-great-solar-bazaar/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: The Great Solar Bazaar'>The Great Solar Bazaar</a></li><li><a href='http://www.energybranding.com/2010/06/admit-it-bp-youre-an-oil-company/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Admit It BP, You&#8217;re An Oil Company'>Admit It BP, You&#8217;re An Oil Company</a></li><li><a href='http://www.energybranding.com/2010/03/the-next-phase-for-solar/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: The next phase for solar'>The next phase for solar</a></li></ol>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Political, social and environmental consequences of climate change have become global concerns. Renewable energy sources, such as wind and solar, would seem to have certain future as part of our national energy future. The alternative energy industry is a nascent one; traditional energy companies are some of the most profitable and powerful on earth. It is likely that the two will work side by side in creating America’s energy future. It is also likely that one will become part of the other, just as the Internet, once hailed as the alternative business model to traditional bricks and mortar businesses, found a viable future as an essential new channel for those companies it once threatened to displace.</p>
<p>The challenge for renewable energy companies is how best to position themselves in the energy equation before the technologies become swallowed up in someone else’s brand.</p>
<p>There are elements of the same Internet zeal in certain quarters of the renewable energy industry that doing a disservice to its future. Renewable energy is the only future. The only way. The rejection of nuclear is part of this. Critics of nuclear power argue it is not a renewable energy source. It is not &#8220;green&#8221; they say because the waste must be stored for hundreds of thousands of years.</p>
<p>No energy source is perfect. No single energy source will solve our problems. Nuclear energy is an essential part of the mix.</p>
<p><br class="spacer_" /></p>
<p>Read the reference Reuters article at:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.google.com/url?sa=X&amp;q=http://www.reuters.com/article/GlobalClimateandAlternativeEnergy09/idUSTRE58838Q20090909&amp;ct=ga&amp;cd=Uax26jB2ZvU&amp;usg=AFQjCNGZX7s3xHrI9hNdQLOlS_LGo4aBVw"><em>Seize nuclear or miss targets, investment: IAEA</em></a><br />
 <em><a href="http://www.reuters.com/">Reuters</a><br />
 Investment in <strong>renewable energy</strong> and efficiency programmes would allow countries to meet emissions targets without nuclear, they say. (<a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/GlobalClimateandAlternativeEnergy09/idUSTRE58838Q20090909">read more </a>of the news article)</em></p>


<p>Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://www.energybranding.com/2009/11/the-great-solar-bazaar/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: The Great Solar Bazaar'>The Great Solar Bazaar</a></li><li><a href='http://www.energybranding.com/2010/06/admit-it-bp-youre-an-oil-company/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Admit It BP, You&#8217;re An Oil Company'>Admit It BP, You&#8217;re An Oil Company</a></li><li><a href='http://www.energybranding.com/2010/03/the-next-phase-for-solar/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: The next phase for solar'>The next phase for solar</a></li></ol></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.energybranding.com/2010/01/seize-nuclear-or-miss-targets-investment-iaea/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

